4 Points for Teachers to Consider, or: Shut the Hell Up
It’s the time of the
semester I love most: the end. This is the time when I get to wrap things
up and feel a sense of completion, and when I get to plan for the next set of
classes, think of what to do better, what mistakes to address, what improvements
to make. This is also the time when my colleagues decide to vent, which
is a nicer way of saying bitch.
A few essays, articles, blog
posts, and Facebook rants have made their way across the Hungry Inferno radar
this week, the gist always the same: students suck. They’re lazy and they
lie. They ask inappropriate questions and have a sense of entitlement.
They show up late and miss class and then ask for extensions, all things I
would never do. Fucking assholes…
All true, but so what?
What do you hope to achieve with these rants? Sympathy? Fuck you;
your job is hard, but you knew that going in.
To combat this tide of
bitching, I’ve composed some things that teachers, especially those who teach
freshman composition, ought to keep in mind:
1. If you remember that most people are assholes, you won’t be surprised
when they act like assholes.
I don’t always recommend
pessimism but it’s a good way to not be surprised by people’s assholish
behavior. And, like most people, students can be assholes. But
they’re kids. You’re an adult, therefore your asshole behavior is worse
than theirs. And writing a list of things that you would never have asked
a professor when you were a student is the act of an asshole, asshole.
2. You were different than they are.
Most teachers remember what
they were like as students and are amazed that the kids they instruct don’t act
similarly. I hear/read this all the time: when I was a student I was
early to every class and I did all my work on time. Of course. You
liked school. Or you understood its importance. How do I know this?
Because you're a teacher. Most people who hate school don’t go into
teaching. But you did, so chances are you come from an environment that
values education. Maybe your parents exposed you to ideas and books at an
early age. Maybe they encouraged you. Maybe they even supported you
while you were a student. And so you met the challenges and asked the
right questions and developed relationships with your professors and you sought
help when you needed it and did the extra credit when it was offered. But
if you work where I work you ought to know that this is not the reality of our
students. They have grown up in very different environments. They
are used to passing a class because they showed up. You can barely
imagine the lives they have led, the things they have experienced, and the
problems they have faced. By ignoring this, or worse, making a joke about the students and their poor skills, you become an elitist jerk, fulfilling a stereotype about college professors. Nice work.
Also, question the material
you use in the classroom. Personally, I think all English classes ought
to use poetry, literature in translation, and avant-garde fiction, but clearly
that’s not allowed in ENG 101. And I never expect my students to give a
shit about the things that interest me. So maybe you grew up reading
books. Maybe you loved Salinger or Kerouac or Jane Austin when you were
their age, but there’s a very good chance that your students couldn’t give a
rat’s ass. Maybe your love of Salinger or Kerouac or Jane Austin led you
to go from high school to college to grad school. Then you started teaching
after a long time in academia. Maybe you don’t understand what life
outside academia is like. Maybe you worked during school making
cappuccinos or clerking in a video store. But that’s not the experience
of most of your students. Keep in mind that Paulo Freire’s banking
concept of education cuts both ways. Thus, it might be to your and your
students’ benefit to consider material that will engage and challenge, rather
than alienate.
Which leads me to my next
point…
3. Times have changed.
If you grew up when I grew
up and studied when I studied, you may notice that things have changed.
There’s this thing called the Internet. There are these gadgets called
Smart Phones. We can debate the merits of these gizmos later, but one
cannot deny that these iThings have created a new problem, or, if you prefer,
they exacerbated a pre-existing problem. In short: all these devices have
cultivated a culture that values speed and convenience. One of the
downfalls of this is that young adults, already an easily distracted lot, are
often unfocused. Email and Blackboard don’t help, as these technological
tools further the idea that instructors are always only a few keystrokes away.
Office hours are, essentially, stretched beyond the times posted on your door.
So if a student expects you to answer an email at nine PM, you can’t fault them
completely. They are online constantly. They are tweeting and
texting as if doing so were a physical necessity. They are in constant
contact with their family and friends. And they think this is normal.
Of course when we were students we had none of these options. We knew
that a meeting with a teacher had to be set up in advance and held during a
specific timeframe. And while students today need to understand that you
are not required to reply to their requests immediately, you shouldn’t be
surprised when these kids, raised on social networks and YouTube videos, assume
you’ll always be online. It’s a bitch, but what isn’t?
Another symptom of our
instant access culture is that these before mentioned unfocused brats are
(guess what) unfocused. This presents a challenge, one that all teachers
have had to address, but now it’s worse than ever. Well, at least worse
than it was when you were their age. This doesn’t excuse their lack of
focus but at least try to address the problem, not the symptom. How to
address the problem? Engage, engage engage. Consider ways to make
your lectures a little more tech savvy and interactive. PowerPoint
slideshows, the occasional video, and group work go a long way. You’ll
likely still have a few bored students texting, but bitching about it on
Facebook won’t help.
4. What’s behind your decision to teach?
I get it. You’re
frustrated that no literary agent will look at your manuscript, which would
allow you to snag a book deal, which would allow you to teach MFA students how
to write turgid, dull MFA novels. But until that happens, you’re stuck
teaching freshman comp. I know how you feel because no literary agent
will look at my manuscript. But while I know very well that I am a
goddamn genius, I don’t expect anyone else to know this. And I know that,
until my genius is properly introduced to the world, I have to remember that
these classes I teach, which are not always the classes I might want to teach,
are populated with students who deserve a teacher without a fucking ego.
Remember also that these students are not writers. They may tweet and
text ‘round the clock, but they don’t give a shit about comma splices and
thesis statements. They should and they need to if they are going to pass
your class and most classes ahead of them, but they need motivation from an
invested instructor who doesn’t talk shit about them behind their backs.
One day you’ll get to teach MFA students how to write like Jonathan Franzen and
Zadie Smith, but until then remember who they are, not who you wish they would
be.
I am not a perfect teacher.
Not by a long shot. But I know this, so I let go of my ego. I also
know that my life outside of my job should not interfere with my time in the
classroom.
Okay, rant over. Go
back to your summer vacation.
<< Home